• About
    • History of Dallas SEO
    • SEO Expert Witness Services
  • Contact
  • Topics
    • Bing
    • Blogging
    • Branding
    • Domain Names
    • Google
    • Internet Marketing
    • Link Building
    • Local Search
    • Marketing
    • Public Relations
    • Reputation Management
    • Search Engine Marketing
    • Search Engine Optimization
    • Search Engines
    • Social Media
    • Tech
  • Advertise
  • Email Newsletter

Bill Hartzer

Bill Hartzer on Search, Marketing, Tech, and Domains.

SEMrush

Home » Marketing » Google Files for Trademark on the Word Glass

Google Files for Trademark on the Word Glass

Posted on April 4, 2014 Written by Bill Hartzer

Google has filed a trademark application on the word glass. The Wall Street Journal first reported that a trademark application has been filed.

Rob Garner Wearing Google Glass
Rob Garner wearing Google Glass

In July 2013, Google “originally submitted the application in July 2013 for the word “Glass” styled in a particular font as branding for its Google Glass smart glasses. The USPTO responded in the fall, saying there are two problems with trademarking “Glass.”,” according to arstechnica. Arstechnica goes on to say that the USPTO had responded to their original trademark application saying that there was a problem with it. “The first is that the word is “merely descriptive” and that the product does not actually contain any glass (it’s made of titanium and plastic). Second, the word is too similar to pre-existing trademarks, making confusion “as to the source of the goods” likely, the USPTO said.”

Trying to trademark a “generic” keyword phrase like the word “Glass” is, in fact, similar to other generic keywords that have been attempted to be trademarked. For example, The Atlantic mentions some interesting attempts by other companies:

Apple has tried to trademark the word “startup.”
Apple and Amazon have faced off in court over the use of the term “app store.”
Amazon has successfully filed for trademarks for the terms “Prime,” “I want one!,” “of note,” “look inside,” and “Earth’s biggest.”
Facebook has tried to trademark the word “book.”
Facebook has successfully trademarked “F,” “Face,” “FB,” and “Wall.” Oh, and also “Facepile.”
Instagram has tried to stop other apps from using “Insta,” “Gram,” and “IG.”
Microsoft has trademarked the word “haunt.”
Twitter has trademarked the word “tweet.”

In the March 20, 2014 filed trademark document, Google emphasized the fact that there is no likelihood of confusion amongst consumers.

“Finally, while the Examiner indicates that Applicant’s Stylized Mark may be confusingly similar to certain marks pending registration, Applicant respectfully submits that these applications, for the reasons set forth below, also should not preclude registration.

I. THERE IS NO LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION

A. Likelihood of Confusion Factors

The question of likelihood of confusion between marks is “related not to the nature of the mark but to its effect “when applied to the goods of the applicant”. The only relevant application is made in the marketplace. The words “when applied” do not refer to a mental exercise, but to all of the known circumstances surrounding use of the mark…. In determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion, courts look at to many factors, including:

– The number and nature of similar markets in use on similar goods or services;
– The similarity or dissimilarity and nature of the goods or services such that one party’s goods will be mistaken for those of the other party;
– The channels of distribution of the goods or services;
– The sophistication of the purchasers of the goods or services;
– The similarity or dissimilarity of the marks in their entirety; and
– The nature and extent of any actual confusion.”

Do you think Google should be granted a trademark on the word “Glass”?

Filed Under: Marketing, Marketing Foo

SEMrush

About Bill Hartzer

Bill Hartzer is CEO of Hartzer Consulting, an SEO Consulting firm that includes services such as search engine optimization, technical SEO audits, domain name consulting, and online reputation management. As an SEO Expert, Mr. Hartzer frequently serves as an SEO Expert Witness and Domain Name Expert Witness in legal cases worldwide.

Recent Posts

  • ChatGPT Versus Google Bard: Which is Better? March 22, 2023
  • All Domain Names Need SSL: Parked Domains Are Losing Traffic, Revenue March 17, 2023
  • Google is Finally Sunsetting Google Glass March 16, 2023
  • Microsoft Teams Free Classic Shutting Down April 12, 2023 February 21, 2023
  • GoDaddy Customer Loses Domain Name Due to Auto Renew Fail February 9, 2023
  • dotDB is Not Shutting Down February 1, 2023
  • Someone Stole My Domain Name: Here’s What You Do January 4, 2023
  • Web Hosting Services Market to Grow to $254.86 Billion by 2029 December 13, 2022
  • This SEO Blog Post Was Written by ChatGPT December 8, 2022
  • Facebook Rolling Out Facebook Articles December 7, 2022
  • Doing SEO is Better Than… December 6, 2022
  • Tucows and GoDaddy Report Q3 2022 Results November 6, 2022
  • How to Measure App Events Sourced by Organic Search and SEO September 20, 2022
  • Google Allegedly Eavesdrops and Monitors the Brain 24 hours a Day to Control Humanity September 14, 2022
  • Why You Shouldn’t Hire SEOs Based on An Email September 13, 2022
  • Global SEO Market to Reach $122.11 Billion by 2028 September 9, 2022
  • Bluehost Launches New Commerce Solutions for WordPress September 8, 2022
  • Which CMS? How to Choose the Best CMS for Your Purposes August 29, 2022
  • Accidental SEO Manager: Interview with Ash Nallawalla August 15, 2022
  • Sometimes Google Isn’t Family Friendly August 1, 2022

US Agency Awards Judge

DFWSEM logo

Bill Hartzer is a Brand Ambassador for:



Industry Friends

I Love SEO
WTFSEO
SEO By the Sea
Jeff Lenney
Jeff Gabriel
Phil Drinkwater
Dixon Jones
Brian Hartzer
Navah Hopkins
DNAccess

Connect With Bill Hartzer

Bill Hartzer on Twitter
Bill Hartzer on Instagram
Hartzer Consulting on Facebook
Bill Hartzer on Facebook
Bill Hartzer on YouTube

Categories

  • Advertising (19)
  • Bing Search Engine (6)
  • Blogging (42)
  • Branding (12)
  • Domain Names (212)
  • Google (237)
  • Internet Marketing (25)
  • Internet Usage (85)
  • Link Building (53)
  • Local Search (39)
  • Marketing (182)
  • Marketing Foo (30)
  • Pay Per Click (3)
  • Podcast (18)
  • Public Relations (8)
  • Reputation Management (9)
  • Search Engine Marketing (44)
  • Search Engine Marketing Events (48)
  • Search Engine Marketing Firms (19)
  • Search Engine Marketing Jobs (33)
  • Search Engine Optimization (164)
  • Search Engines (204)
  • Social Media (192)
  • Tech (7)
  • Web Analytics (17)
  • Webinars (1)

Note: All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only, and are mentioned only to help my readers. All other trademarks cited herein are the property of their respective owners. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement.




Hartzer Consulting



Website, Content, and Marketing by Hartzer Consulting, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 ·