• About
    • History of Dallas SEO
  • Contact
  • Topics
    • Bing
    • Blogging
    • Branding
    • Domain Names
    • Google
    • Internet Marketing
    • Link Building
    • Local Search
    • Marketing
    • Public Relations
    • Reputation Management
    • Search Engine Marketing
    • Search Engine Optimization
    • Search Engines
    • Social Media
  • Tech
  • Advertise
  • Services
    • Search Engine Optimization
    • Ongoing SEO Services
    • SEO Expert Witness
    • Google Penalty Recovery
    • Mini SEO Audit
    • Link Audit
    • Keyword Research
    • Combine Websites SEO Services
    • PPC Management
    • Online Reputation Management
    • Domain Name Consultant
    • Domain Names & Expired Domains
    • Domain Name Appraisal

Bill Hartzer

..
Home » Google » Not Again: Google Maps Ranking in Organic Search Results

Not Again: Google Maps Ranking in Organic Search Results

Posted on July 6, 2017 Written by Bill Hartzer

I know I’ve been a pretty touch critic of Google lately, but I continue to see search results in Google that I don’t agree with. So, of course I’m going to bring it up. I recently wrote about the fact that Google’s maps results were showing up for a particular search query, antique auctions northeast Georgia. That search query is Google’s custom maps, created by users. I can potentially see the benefit for showing that in the search results.

But this one is different. Google is indexing (and ranking) their own maps results. As if someone searched for that query on a map. And for this particular example search query:

18300 West Alameda Parkway Morrison, CO 80465

Google’s maps is showing up #1 for that search query. That’s an address. Rather than show the actual map of that address, and maybe even showing the actual business at that address, Google ranks their maps page #1, as in the number one position. Numero Uno. Not the business, which happens to be Red Rocks Amphitheatre, the maps URL is #1.

Here’s what I’m seeing:

18300 West Alameda Parkway Morrison, CO 80465

For this particular search query, I would fully expect a map, as in a graphic of the location.

I don’t think that showing search results, maps results, in Google’s organic search search results is helpful. As you might recall, I pointed out a while back that Google was showing Bing’s search results in their search results. So how is this different? I mean, is it okay for Google to show their very own pages, essentially search results of maps, in their search results?

As a user, I’m searching for an address, so wouldn’t it be more appropriate to show something like this?

1600 pennsylvania avenue washington dc

But instead, for certain addresses, Google isn’t showing a map–they’re ranking their maps URLs in the top position. You can find plenty of other examples of this if you use this search query:

site:https://www.google.com/maps/search/

There are over 14,000,000 (fourteen MILLION pages) indexed in Google of their maps locations. Oh, by the way, just looking through those search results, they’re not very well optimized, and they don’t really comply with SEO best practices. The have the same title tags on many pages, and the meta description tag is the same. And it appears that that section of the site has a Google Panda problem.

Related Posts

  • Hackers Hijack Google Results: Bybit Exposes AI-Powered macOS Malware Targeting Claude Code Searches
  • Brandpoint: 60% of Google Searches End Without Clicks
  • Google’s New Discover Update Is Live
  • Google Is Shutting Down Its Dark Web Report
  • After Years of Resistance, Google Agrees to South Korea’s Strict Mapping Rules

Filed Under: Google

About Bill Hartzer

Bill Hartzer is the CEO of Hartzer Consulting and founder of DNAccess, a domain name protection and recovery service. A recognized authority in digital marketing and domain name strategy, Bill is frequently called upon as an Expert Witness in internet-related legal cases. He's been sharing his insights, expertise, and research here on BillHartzer.com for over two decades.

Bill Hartzer on Search, Marketing, Tech, and Domains.

Hartzer Domains

DFWSEM logo

 

 

Brand Ambassador for:

Majestic logo

Oncrawl logo

Industry Friends

  • David Daniels
  • WTFSEO
  • SEO By the Sea
  • Jeff Lenney
  • Jeff Gabriel
  • Scott Hendison
  • Dixon Jones
  • Brian Hartzer
  • Navah Hopkins
  • DNAccess
  • Hartzer on IT.com
  • Jason Olson

Connect With Bill Hartzer

  • Bill Hartzer on X
  • Bill Hartzer on BlueSky
  • Bill Hartzer on Instagram
  • Hartzer Consulting on Facebook
  • Bill Hartzer on Facebook
  • Bill Hartzer on YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Semrush Studied 1,094 ChatGPT Categories. The Number That Matters Is Not 53.7%.
  • Study: Home Service Companies That Track Profit Instead of Leads Get 38% More From Their Ad Spend
  • LinkedIn Reach Is Up 14% For Executives. The Same Report Says Organic Reach Is Collapsing.
  • The Dental SEO Playbook Is Changing: Identity Dental Marketing Releases AEO vs. SEO Study
  • Link Freedom Group Just Bet Tens of Millions on the Future of the Internet
  • The .ORG Impact Awards Just Named 35 Global Changemakers—and the Finalists Are Remarkable
  • Marlow Launches Its AI Software Builder
  • Brands Keep Killing Their Best Ads Too Early—New Agentio Report Says Here’s What They Should Do Instead
  • accessiBe Launches AI Accessibility Assistant
  • Viral Nation Launches AI Discovery as Brands Face a New Problem: Getting Recommended by AI
Note: All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only, and are mentioned only to help my readers. All other trademarks cited herein are the property of their respective owners. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement.

  Hartzer Consulting

Website, Content, and Marketing by Hartzer Consulting, LLC.
Disclaimer - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - AI Instructions - Entity Map

Copyright © 2026 ·