• About
    • History of Dallas SEO
  • Contact
  • Topics
    • Bing
    • Blogging
    • Branding
    • Domain Names
    • Google
    • Internet Marketing
    • Link Building
    • Local Search
    • Marketing
    • Public Relations
    • Reputation Management
    • Search Engine Marketing
    • Search Engine Optimization
    • Search Engines
    • Social Media
  • Tech
  • Advertise
  • Services
    • Search Engine Optimization
    • Ongoing SEO Services
    • SEO Expert Witness
    • Google Penalty Recovery
    • Mini SEO Audit
    • Link Audit
    • Keyword Research
    • Combine Websites SEO Services
    • PPC Management
    • Online Reputation Management
    • Domain Name Consultant
    • Domain Names & Expired Domains
    • Domain Name Appraisal

Bill Hartzer

GoDaddy Airo: Register your .com domain name today!
Home » Marketing » Google to Pay $22.5 Million to Settle FTC Privacy Charges

Google to Pay $22.5 Million to Settle FTC Privacy Charges

Posted on August 9, 2012 Written by Bill Hartzer

Google has agreed to pay a $22.5 million dollar civil penalty to settle FTC (Federal Trade Commission) charges that Google misrepresented themselves when it came to the privacy of Apple users. Google told users of Apple’s Safari web browser that Google would not place tracking cookies or serve targeted ads to those users. That violated an earlier privacy settlement between Google and the FTC.

FTC ruling Google Privacy August 9 2012

In its complaint, the FTC charged that for “several months in 2011 and 2012, Google placed a certain advertising tracking cookie on the computers of Safari users who visited sites within Google’s DoubleClick advertising network, although Google had previously told these users they would automatically be opted out of such tracking, as a result of the default settings of the Safari browser used in Macs, iPhones and iPads.

According to the FTC’s complaint, Google specifically told Safari users that because the Safari browser is set by default to block third-party cookies, as long as users do not change their browser settings, this setting “effectively accomplishes the same thing as [opting out of this particular Google advertising tracking cookie].” In addition, Google represented that it is a member of an industry group called the Network Advertising Initiative, which requires members to adhere to its self-regulatory code of conduct, including disclosure of their data collection and use practices.

Despite these promises, the FTC charged that Google placed advertising tracking cookies on consumers’ computers, in many cases by circumventing the Safari browser’s default cookie-blocking setting. Google exploited an exception to the browser’s default setting to place a temporary cookie from the DoubleClick domain. Because of the particular operation of the Safari browser, that initial temporary cookie opened the door to all cookies from the DoubleClick domain, including the Google advertising tracking cookie that Google had represented would be blocked from Safari browsers.”

Here is some of the text from the FTC’s rulings:

I. CIVIL PENALTY JUDGMENT
IT IS ORDERED that judgment in the amount of twenty-two million five hundred
thousand dollars ($22,500,000) is hereby entered against Defendant as a civil penalty pursuant to
Section 5(l) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(l).

A. Within five (5) days of entry of this Order, Defendant shall transfer the civil
penalty payment in the form of an electronic fund transfer in accordance with the procedures
specified by the Consumer Protection Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20530.

B. In the event of any default in payment, the entire unpaid amount, together with
interest, as computed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date of default to the date of
payment, shall immediately become due and payable.

C. Defendant relinquishes all dominion, control, and title to the funds paid to the
fullest extent permitted by law. Defendant shall make no claim to or demand for return of the
funds, directly or indirectly, through counsel or otherwise.

II. REMEDIATION
Until February 15, 2014, Defendant will maintain systems configured to instruct Safari brand
web browsers to expire any DoubleClick.net cookie placed by Defendant through
February 15, 2012 if those systems encounter such a cookie, with the exception of the
DoubleClick opt-out cookie.

Personally, I think $22.5 million is rather low here, given the number of users involved and the amount that Google has potentially made from the information they gathered.

Related Posts

  • Businesses Fired the Human Overseer From Their AI. New Data Shows How Fast It Happened
  • Your Brand’s On the Ballot: Should You Publicly Take Political or Social Stances?
  • Study: Seeing Every Angle Is Saving Online Retail Millions in Returns
  • Way Rewrites Experiential Marketing With AI, Loyalty, and Brand Partnerships
  • 2026 MarketFully Report: Multilingual Content Spending Is Exploding

Filed Under: Marketing

About Bill Hartzer

Bill Hartzer is the CEO of Hartzer Consulting and founder of DNAccess, a domain name protection and recovery service. A recognized authority in digital marketing and domain name strategy, Bill is frequently called upon as an Expert Witness in internet-related legal cases. He's been sharing his insights, expertise, and research here on BillHartzer.com for over two decades.

Bill Hartzer on Search, Marketing, Tech, and Domains.

Hartzer Domains

Bare-Metal Servers by HostDime

DFWSEM logo

 

 

Brand Ambassador for:

Majestic logo

Oncrawl logo

Industry Friends

  • David Daniels
  • WTFSEO
  • SEO By the Sea
  • Jeff Lenney
  • Jeff Gabriel
  • Scott Hendison
  • Dixon Jones
  • Brian Hartzer
  • Navah Hopkins
  • DNAccess
  • SEO Dallas
  • Confirmed Stolen
  • Hartzer on IT.com
  • Jason Olson

Connect With Bill Hartzer

  • Bill Hartzer on X
  • Bill Hartzer on BlueSky
  • Bill Hartzer on Instagram
  • Hartzer Consulting on Facebook
  • Bill Hartzer on Facebook
  • Bill Hartzer on YouTube

Recent Posts

  • New Data: AI Visitors Sign Up 11x More Than Google Traffic
  • Businesses Fired the Human Overseer From Their AI. New Data Shows How Fast It Happened
  • When a Web Developer Holds Your Domain Name Hostage: “You Didn’t Pay Me” Is Not a Defense
  • Forget the Design Team: One URL Now Builds a Full Set of Ads
  • What People Actually Ask Before Turning a Video into an MP3
  • ChatGPT Just Beat Google at Sending Businesses Their Hottest Leads, 70 Million Calls Prove It
  • Which AI Model Should You Use? A Practical Guide by Task
  • Legal Tech Media Group Bets Big on AEO
  • The Domain Name Gap: What GoDaddy’s 2026 Most Entrepreneurial Cities List Reveals About Digital Presence in America’s Growth Markets
  • Remembering Bruce Clay: The Father of SEO and a Friend Who Changed an Industry
Note: All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only, and are mentioned only to help my readers. All other trademarks cited herein are the property of their respective owners. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement.

  Hartzer Consulting

Website, Content, and Marketing by Hartzer Consulting, LLC.
Disclaimer - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - AI Instructions

Copyright © 2026 ·