• About
    • History of Dallas SEO
    • SEO Expert Witness Services
  • Contact
  • Topics
    • Bing
    • Blogging
    • Branding
    • Domain Names
    • Google
    • Internet Marketing
    • Link Building
    • Local Search
    • Marketing
    • Public Relations
    • Reputation Management
    • Search Engine Marketing
    • Search Engine Optimization
    • Search Engines
    • Social Media
    • Tech
  • Advertise
  • Email Newsletter

Bill Hartzer

Bill Hartzer on Search, Marketing, Tech, and Domains.

SEMrush

Home » Link Building » How to Respond to a Link Removal Request

How to Respond to a Link Removal Request

Posted on February 3, 2013 Written by Bill Hartzer

Google has a lot of webmasters scared. Seriously, they really do. Webmasters are so scared now that they are randomly and blindly emailing all the sites that they know about that link to them–and asking for links to be removed to their website.

Google has been sending “unnatural link warnings” to website owners, telling them that they have unnatural links pointing to their website. Unfortunately, many webmasters freak out, think it’s the end of the world or something, and don’t do their proper link research. They’re then emailing webmasters of good links to their site and getting both the good and the bad links removed.

I have been helping webmasters and website owners who have received unnatural link warnings from Google clean up their links. And, if necessary, use the Google Disavow Links tool, to disavow the bad links.

Here’s a typical email that I received recently from a website owner, named Will:

From: Will
Subject: Got Odd Link-Takedown Request Yesterday; -WTH?

Message Body:
Hi Bill!,
Read your article found through a Google search.

-So Yesterday, I got this takedown request and I am not exactly sure what to make of it.

Do you know what the hell this is?

It seemed a little odd and counterintuitive, as:

1)My site, XXXXXXXXXXXX.net is a legit, high-quality XXXXX blog and has nothing to do with spam.

2)I did the posts because I thought XXXXX’s infographics were great, not because of something nefarious.

3)I was following proper Source Attribution ethics, such as Maria Popova’s “The Curator’s Code”

4)All Link-Text/Names were checked vs. their URLs, and there are no discrepancies.

-So: is this just XXXX carpetbombing because Google penalized them for shady SEO in the past, or is it something different?

Any thoughts & ideas would be most welcome.

Cheers+Best,

Will

Here’s The Email I Received, Quote:”
Hi Will,

My name is Jonathan and I’m getting in touch on behalf of XXXX company. I noticed that you’ve linked to my website on your page XXXXXXXX.net/page.html with the text “XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX” and am requesting that you remove the link.

I’m asking this because it’s come to our attention that some of the links to our website have been acquired against Google’s Webmaster Guidelines, so it’s important for us to remove links that are harming traffic to our website. Furthermore, by linking to our site, it could be detrimental to your site’s overall traffic, so it will be important for you to remove the link.

Please let me know if you have any questions. If you could email me once you have removed the link that would be great.

Best,

Jonathan XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.org
Compliance and Standards Team”

-End Quote

I have removed the names of websites and the anchor text and URLs in this to protect the innocent webmasters involved. This is typical. Many of these webmasters are mistakenly emailing lots of good websites–and asking them to take links down or remove the links. This is just wrong. There are cases where links need to be removed–especially if someone hacked into a website and added a page to the site (with your link back to the site). I spent HOURS today identifying all these bad links and am going to take care of them for my client. Here’s just one of hundreds of pages that have been added to literally thousands of websites by hacking into their site:

bad-backlinks-example-hacked-site

In the case above, it’s very clear that this is a bad backlink. The page is on someone’s site that has nothing to do with the University of Texas at Arlington (it’s obviously been hacked) and the page should only be on an .EDU site, NOT on some miscellaneous website. Those are the types of links that must be removed.

By notifying the site owners of these types of pages, many have gotten right back to me–explaining that they didn’t know their site was hacked like that. And they’re taking care of the link. So, if you get the link removed, do you really need to use Google or Bing’s disavow link tool to disavow the link? Well, no.

So, if you have a good website and you know that your outgoing links are not bad outgoing links, and you receive one of these takedown notices or link removal notices, then don’t take it personally. In many cases, the webmaster is wrong–and the link should NOT be removed. Perhaps they might like to change the anchor text of how you’re linking to them–but in many cases, if you know your website does not have a problem (like it’s not been hacked and it’s not been de-indexed by Google), then you have nothing to worry about.

So, what about Will? Well, I immediately emailed him:

Bill Hartzer wrote:
I would not worry too much about it. Some websites got link warnings from google and are mistakenly sending out notices like this. They are really only hurting their own site. I would not take it personally.

Here’s what Will wrote back to me:

Ok, cool.

Thanks VERY MUCH for your Extremely fast reply!
I was a little worried there for awhile.

Cheers,
Will

Another fellow website owner helped–for some reason I feel really good about this one. The site was actually really good–and the anchor text of the link was about 5 words in length. Not something that I would have tried to get removed. Oh well.

Filed Under: Link Building, Search Engine Optimization

SEMrush

About Bill Hartzer

Bill Hartzer is CEO of Hartzer Consulting, LLC, an SEO Consulting firm that includes services such as search engine optimization, technical SEO audits, domain name consulting, and online reputation management.

Recent Posts

  • dotDB is Not Shutting Down February 1, 2023
  • Someone Stole My Domain Name: Here’s What You Do January 4, 2023
  • Web Hosting Services Market to Grow to $254.86 Billion by 2029 December 13, 2022
  • This SEO Blog Post Was Written by ChatGPT December 8, 2022
  • Facebook Rolling Out Facebook Articles December 7, 2022
  • Doing SEO is Better Than… December 6, 2022
  • Tucows and GoDaddy Report Q3 2022 Results November 6, 2022
  • How to Measure App Events Sourced by Organic Search and SEO September 20, 2022
  • Google Allegedly Eavesdrops and Monitors the Brain 24 hours a Day to Control Humanity September 14, 2022
  • Why You Shouldn’t Hire SEOs Based on An Email September 13, 2022
  • Global SEO Market to Reach $122.11 Billion by 2028 September 9, 2022
  • Bluehost Launches New Commerce Solutions for WordPress September 8, 2022
  • Which CMS? How to Choose the Best CMS for Your Purposes August 29, 2022
  • Accidental SEO Manager: Interview with Ash Nallawalla August 15, 2022
  • Sometimes Google Isn’t Family Friendly August 1, 2022
  • Something’s Seriously Wrong with Facebook Notifications July 12, 2022
  • Facebook Internet Tracking Settlement June 24, 2022
  • RankSense Acquired by SEOClarity June 1, 2022
  • LinkedIn Links, Digital Marketing News, and SEO Questions Answered May 9, 2022
  • GoDaddy Ending Forwarding of Existing Shortened Links May 5, 2022

US Agency Awards Judge

DFWSEM logo

Bill Hartzer is a Brand Ambassador for:



Industry Friends

I Love SEO
WTFSEO
SEO By the Sea
Jeff Lenney
Jeff Gabriel
Phil Drinkwater
Dixon Jones
Brian Hartzer
Navah Hopkins

Connect With Bill Hartzer

Bill Hartzer on Twitter
Bill Hartzer on Instagram
Hartzer Consulting on Facebook
Bill Hartzer on Facebook
Bill Hartzer on YouTube

Categories

  • Advertising (19)
  • Bing Search Engine (6)
  • Blogging (42)
  • Branding (12)
  • Domain Names (210)
  • Google (236)
  • Internet Marketing (25)
  • Internet Usage (85)
  • Link Building (53)
  • Local Search (39)
  • Marketing (180)
  • Marketing Foo (30)
  • Pay Per Click (3)
  • Podcast (18)
  • Public Relations (8)
  • Reputation Management (9)
  • Search Engine Marketing (44)
  • Search Engine Marketing Events (48)
  • Search Engine Marketing Firms (19)
  • Search Engine Marketing Jobs (33)
  • Search Engine Optimization (164)
  • Search Engines (204)
  • Social Media (192)
  • Tech (7)
  • Web Analytics (17)
  • Webinars (1)

Note: All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only, and are mentioned only to help my readers. All other trademarks cited herein are the property of their respective owners. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement.




Hartzer Consulting



Website, Content, and Marketing by Hartzer Consulting, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 ·