• About
    • History of Dallas SEO
  • Contact
  • Topics
    • Bing
    • Blogging
    • Branding
    • Domain Names
    • Google
    • Internet Marketing
    • Link Building
    • Local Search
    • Marketing
    • Public Relations
    • Reputation Management
    • Search Engine Marketing
    • Search Engine Optimization
    • Search Engines
    • Social Media
  • Tech
  • Advertise
  • Services
    • Search Engine Optimization
    • Ongoing SEO Services
    • SEO Expert Witness
    • Google Penalty Recovery
    • Mini SEO Audit
    • Link Audit
    • Keyword Research
    • Combine Websites SEO Services
    • PPC Management
    • Online Reputation Management
    • Domain Name Consultant
    • Domain Names & Expired Domains
    • Domain Name Appraisal

Bill Hartzer

..
Home » Local Search » Why I Removed My Agency’s Google Business Profile Again (And Why It Matters)

Why I Removed My Agency’s Google Business Profile Again (And Why It Matters)

Posted on December 30, 2024 Written by Bill Hartzer

 

At the end of 2024, I made the decision to disable and completely remove my agency’s Google Business Profile (GBP). This wasn’t the first time I’ve taken this step—I originally removed it back in 2019 for several reasons but later reinstated it. After careful consideration, I’ve once again removed it entirely. Here’s why.

Jump To

Toggle
  • The Core Issue: My Business Is Not Local
    • The Risk of “Local Bias” in Search
  • Lessons from 2019: What Happened Then
  • Why I Removed It Again in 2024
  • Should You Remove Your GBP?
    • Related Posts

The Core Issue: My Business Is Not Local

One of the primary reasons for removing my agency’s GBP is that it’s technically ineligible under Google’s guidelines. My business operates entirely online, with no in-person customer interactions at a physical address. Maintaining a GBP implies a local presence, which can misrepresent the nature of my business to Google and potential clients.

Moreover, Google’s algorithms tend to tie businesses with a GBP listing to a specific location. For a business like mine that serves clients nationally and internationally, this localization can limit visibility in search engine results pages (SERPs). By associating my agency with a single location, Google may prioritize showing my website only to users near that area, potentially reducing traffic from other regions.

The Risk of “Local Bias” in Search

Google’s search algorithms incorporate a local bias, especially for industries where location matters. For example, if you’re a realtor, Google’s SERPs will often show results like “[City Name] realtors” or simply prioritize businesses nearby. While this works well for location-based services, it’s counterproductive for businesses like mine that have no regional ties.

By removing my GBP, I’ve seen evidence of reduced local bias and improved rankings for non-location-specific keywords. This allows my website to compete on a broader scale for organic traffic, rather than being limited by geographic parameters.

Lessons from 2019: What Happened Then

When I removed my GBP in 2019, it led to several positive outcomes:

  1. Improved Traffic: My site saw a noticeable lift in organic traffic and better rankings for generic, non-location-specific keywords.
  2. Better Client Alignment: My business’s unique nature—serving clients across the U.S. and internationally—became clearer to search engines and potential clients alike.
  3. Avoiding Misdirected Queries: With the GBP active, the majority of keyword insights from Google’s dashboard were irrelevant, often relating to professions like lawyers or therapists. These mismatches highlighted the disconnect between local search intent and my actual services.

Why I Removed It Again in 2024

Despite briefly reinstating the GBP, I realized the challenges I faced in 2019 were still present:

  • No Local Clients: My clientele remains entirely non-local, with no business originating from my area.
  • Irrelevant Associations: The GBP algorithm often associated my agency with unrelated local businesses and keywords.
  • Traffic Risks: The potential for traffic loss due to localized SERP customization outweighed any perceived benefits of maintaining a GBP.

Here’s confirmation (via email) that the listing is removed:

GBP profile removed

Should You Remove Your GBP?

The decision to maintain or remove a Google Business Profile depends largely on your business model:

  • Local Businesses: If you rely on local clients or have a physical storefront, a GBP is essential for visibility and credibility.
  • National/Online Businesses: If your clients are geographically dispersed and you conduct business online, a GBP may limit your reach and potentially harm organic rankings.

Removing my agency’s GBP wasn’t a decision I took lightly, but it aligns with my business’s goals and operational model. For businesses that operate nationally or globally, avoiding unnecessary localization can improve visibility and ensure you’re reaching the right audience.

If your business doesn’t fit the local mold, it might be time to reconsider the role of a GBP in your strategy. In my experience, removing it has proven to be a step forward—both in 2019 and now at the close of 2024.

Stay tuned, as I am documenting, again, the analytics data, ranking data, and overall data of what happens, as well as how long it takes, to see results.

 

 

 

 

Related Posts

  • AI Local Business Recommendations Went From 6% To 45% In A Year. The Bigger Number Is 88%
  • Study: Home Service Companies That Track Profit Instead of Leads Get 38% More From Their Ad Spend
  • Your Google Listing Is Flagged” Voicemail? This Is Why You Shouldn’t Panic (or Pay)
  • Yelp Just Teamed Up With Hatch
  • Meet MYTSV: The YouTube-Style Directory That’s Redefining Local Search

Filed Under: Local Search

About Bill Hartzer

Bill Hartzer is the CEO of Hartzer Consulting and founder of DNAccess, a domain name protection and recovery service. A recognized authority in digital marketing and domain name strategy, Bill is frequently called upon as an Expert Witness in internet-related legal cases. He's been sharing his insights, expertise, and research here on BillHartzer.com for over two decades.

Bill Hartzer on Search, Marketing, Tech, and Domains.

Hartzer Domains

DFWSEM logo

 

 

Brand Ambassador for:

Majestic logo

Oncrawl logo

Industry Friends

  • David Daniels
  • WTFSEO
  • SEO By the Sea
  • Jeff Lenney
  • Jeff Gabriel
  • Scott Hendison
  • Dixon Jones
  • Brian Hartzer
  • Navah Hopkins
  • DNAccess
  • Hartzer on IT.com
  • Jason Olson

Connect With Bill Hartzer

  • Bill Hartzer on X
  • Bill Hartzer on BlueSky
  • Bill Hartzer on Instagram
  • Hartzer Consulting on Facebook
  • Bill Hartzer on Facebook
  • Bill Hartzer on YouTube

Recent Posts

  • The Reputation Engagement I Would Rather Have Than the Friday Afternoon One
  • A Judge Ordered an Expert’s AI Prompts Produced. There Is Still No Standard, So I Wrote One
  • Facebook Says an Account Called “Meta Verrified” Sending Phishing Messages Doesn’t Violate Its Rules
  • I Read 30 Digital Marketing Tool Licenses. Most Do Not Say What You Think.
  • 131 SEO Experts Just Ranked Google’s Ranking Factors. Backlinks Did Not Die.
  • AI Local Business Recommendations Went From 6% To 45% In A Year. The Bigger Number Is 88%
  • IAB: 56% Want Creator Voices In AI Shopping Advice, But Nobody Can Verify Which Creators Are Honest
  • Semrush Says Showing Up Once In A ChatGPT Category Is Worse Than Not Showing Up
  • Semrush Studied 1,094 ChatGPT Categories. The Number That Matters Is Not 53.7%.
  • Study: Home Service Companies That Track Profit Instead of Leads Get 38% More From Their Ad Spend
Note: All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only, and are mentioned only to help my readers. All other trademarks cited herein are the property of their respective owners. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement.

  Hartzer Consulting

Website, Content, and Marketing by Hartzer Consulting, LLC.
Disclaimer - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - AI Instructions - Entity Map

Copyright © 2026 ·