Carl Icahn Issues Letter to Yahoo! Shareholders; Microsoft Responds

There has been quite a lot of speculation lately about Microsoft possibly purchasing Yahoo!. A deal like this certainly would certainly change the online marketing and online advertising industry, not to mention what would happen to Yahoo! Search Marketing, Yahoo!’s pay per click (PPC) product.
Carl Icahn has issued a public statement today, an open letter to Yahoo! shareholders. In response, Microsoft issued a statement, as well. Icahn’s open letter is interesting, as it outlines some of the issues. It certainly is an interesting read, so I thought I would share it with you.

Here is the official statement from Carl Icahn:
” Carl C. Icahn
ICAHN CAPITAL LP
767 Fifth Avenue, 47th Floor
New York, NY 10153
July 7, 2008
Dear Yahoo! Shareholders:
During the past week I have spoken frequently with Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft. Several of our conversations have lasted as long as an hour. Also, a few of our discussions have taken place while other top executives, such as Kevin Johnson, participated. Our talks centered on the industry in general but, more importantly, on how Yahoo! and Microsoft can do a transaction together. Steve made it abundantly clear that, due to his experiences with Yahoo! during the past several months, he cannot negotiate any transaction with the current board. His logic is simple. If and when a transaction was consummated, Microsoft would be guaranteeing a great deal of capital at closing. However, a transaction could take at least nine months and perhaps longer to obtain regulatory clearance in the U.S., Europe, and elsewhere. During that period, if the current board and management team of Yahoo! mismanage the company (and their recent track record is far from reassuring), Microsoft would be putting its money at risk and a great deal could be lost.
For example, in a transaction to purchase the whole company, a very large amount of capital would be due at closing. Even in an “alternate” transaction, where just the “Search” assets were purchased, large guarantees would have to be made and, again, large sums could be lost if the company was mismanaged. Microsoft perceives this risk may be quite high with the current board and management in place. However, Steve made it clear to me that if a new board were elected, he would be interested in discussing a major transaction with Yahoo!, such as either a transaction to purchase the “Search” function with large financial guarantees or, in the alternative, purchasing the whole company. He stated that Microsoft would be willing to enter into discussion immediately if the new board that has been nominated were elected. While there can be no assurance of a future transaction, as many of you know, I have negotiated successfully a large number of transactions over the past years. If and when elected, I strongly believe that in very short order the new board would, subject to its fiduciary duties, be presenting to shareholders either a purchase offer for the whole company or a very attractive offer to purchase “Search” with large guarantees. I hope to continue to be speaking to Steve over the next few weeks; however, since I do not as yet represent the Yahoo! board, both Steve and I do not wish to get into details over price, or even which of these transactions makes the most sense.
Much has been said about how badly the Yahoo! board has “botched up” negotiations with Microsoft over the past months. There is no need to keep pointing out the mistakes I believe Yahoo! made by not immediately taking a $33 offer made by Microsoft. But one thing is clear — Jerry Yang and the current board of Yahoo! will not be able to “botch up” a negotiation with Microsoft again, simply because they will not have the opportunity.
Our company is now moving toward a precipice. It is currently losing market share in its “Search” function; our current Board has failed to bring in a talented and experienced CEO to replace Jerry Yang and return Jerry to his role as Chief Yahoo!, and currently it is witnessing a meaningful exodus of talent. It is no secret that Google (which hired a great operator as CEO) continues to dramatically outperform Yahoo!. According to publicly available information, Google’s income from operations grew 59% per year over the last two years while Yahoo!’s shrank 21% per year. However, none of the above has caused the Yahoo! board to hesitate in paying themselves $10,000 per week. IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE.
If elected, I have little doubt that the new board, subject to its fiduciary duties, will do what the current board will not do, i.e.,
– Immediately start negotiation with Microsoft to sell the whole company or, in the alternative, sell “Search” with large guarantees.
– Move expeditiously to replace Jerry Yang with a new CEO with operating experience.
Sincerely yours,
CARL C. ICAHN ”
Here is the official statement from Microsoft:
“In the past week we have had the opportunity to discuss with Carl Icahn the prospects for a possible agreement between Microsoft and Yahoo!.
Despite working since January 31 of this year, as well as in the early part of last year, we have never been able to reach an agreement in a timely way on acceptable terms with the current management and Board of Directors at Yahoo!. We have concluded that we cannot reach an agreement with them. We confirm, however, that after the shareholder election Microsoft would be interested in discussing with a new board a major transaction with Yahoo!, such as either a transaction to purchase the “Search” function with large financial guarantees or, in the alternative, purchasing the whole company.
As Mr. Icahn notes in his statement today, it would be premature to discuss at this time important details such as the price or other terms of a possible transaction. We respect the right of Yahoo!’s shareholders to determine the destiny of their company, and we do not intend to engage in ongoing commentary on these issues in advance of Yahoo!’s shareholder meeting.
As we explained on June 12 when Yahoo! announced an agreement with Google, we believe that our proposed search acquisition and partnership would have delivered superior value to Yahoo!’s shareholders and the marketplace as a whole. We have not changed our position, even as we continue to move forward with our own online search and advertising offerings. We therefore welcome interest by Mr. Icahn in pursuing this and other discussions.
While of course there can be no assurance of a future transaction, we will be prepared to enter into discussions immediately after Yahoo!’s shareholder meeting if a new board is elected.”
Are you looking for marketing services such as social media optimization, search engine marketing, pay per click program management or consulting, or search engine optimization services? Feel free to contact me.
Jul 7th 2008
Microsoft has to buy its way into the internet because the company is loathed by many for its business practices and its mediocre and declining product quality. Even in the OS market, many have rejected Vista.
—Consider the success of Firefox. Linux has done well, even with its flaws, and OpenOffice poses a threat on the word processing front. Microsoft once had almost monopolistic control over these markets, but it alienated many users. Firefox just released a leaner version of its browser. When was the last time Microsoft did anything about cleaning up its bloated, resource-hogging OS and software?
—If Microsoft doesn’t clean up its act, it could be the General Motors of some future decade.
—If Microsoft acquires Yahoo!, many will move their email accounts elsewhere. There are just too many more attractive alternatives on the net, and Microsoft has no advantage there. The one-time inconvenience of an email-address change isn’t burdensome enough to hold users in captivity to Microsoft.
—This sale to Microsoft will likely destroy a good company. It makes sense for those who seek a quick, speculative gain on the stock. But for users, it will be a minor disaster.
Jul 7th 2008
I don’t think this merger/buyout will change anything in the “search” industry. Google has an estimated market share of 70% and Microsoft’s msn/hotmail has failed miserably. This is like the proposed Circuit City/Blockbuster merger, which was called off a couple of weeks ago. You can’t just make one good company by merging two mediocre companies together.
Jul 7th 2008
Come on, we knew this was going to happen a couple months ago when Icahn bought a billion dollars of stock. This guy is a real shark, he’s been eating up people like Jerry Yang for 30 years now. Did anyone really expect him not to win here.
Jul 9th 2008
I remember when google started, at that time altavista was popular. Anyway microsoft just cannot stand that they’re not good at everything. My personal opinion is that they want to be the NO1. allover the IT industry. They want to force people to like them, but buying big companies is not the way of doing that. Apparently Microsoft’s thoughts are different. They couldn’t manage to have a great share in the market with their LiveSearch (which i personally think people are using because of laziness or lack of knowledge howto change IE7 default search provider) so they are trying to buy Yahoo. I bet they would buy google if they could.
Jul 9th 2008
I think it’s fairly obvious that the only aspect of Yahoo that Microsoft really wants is it’s search capabilities. Live Search is terrible, and the easiest way for Microsoft to improve it would be to buy somebody else’s already established service.
Jul 22nd 2008
Perhaps Microsoft realizes that it doesn’t “get” the web right now, hence the huge offer. You don’t just throw money around like that unless you know you are getting value for your money.
If Microsoft infuses Yahoo and Microsoft consolidate talent pools (and trim off the fat) on their web projects, I think big things can happen.
It will ultimately benefit the users also, right now this competition among big 3 (Yahoo, Microsoft, Google) in e-mail/portal/general web space is partitioning the users the way it shouldn’t.