<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study Proves Facebook and Digg Visitors More Loyal; Twitter in Last Place</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/</link>
	<description>The search engine marketing and online promotion expert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nette</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/comment-page-1/#comment-71187</link>
		<dc:creator>Nette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/?p=992#comment-71187</guid>
		<description>indeed, when it comes in social networking facebook is..wow..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>indeed, when it comes in social networking facebook is..wow..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: horseracingresultstoday</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/comment-page-1/#comment-71055</link>
		<dc:creator>horseracingresultstoday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/?p=992#comment-71055</guid>
		<description>Well for me, it depends, I always do some research using google, either tutorials, news, etc. no permanent site or loyal site, it still depends on the content being posted in one site..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well for me, it depends, I always do some research using google, either tutorials, news, etc. no permanent site or loyal site, it still depends on the content being posted in one site..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/comment-page-1/#comment-70869</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/?p=992#comment-70869</guid>
		<description>I am more with Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am more with Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indyainfo</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/comment-page-1/#comment-70836</link>
		<dc:creator>indyainfo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/?p=992#comment-70836</guid>
		<description>Twitter and Google are more about real time searching, facebook in my opinion is much more of a social experience, people click on the links with connection in mind, obviously they are not doing the same on Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter and Google are more about real time searching, facebook in my opinion is much more of a social experience, people click on the links with connection in mind, obviously they are not doing the same on Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denver Engagement Photographer</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/comment-page-1/#comment-70816</link>
		<dc:creator>Denver Engagement Photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/?p=992#comment-70816</guid>
		<description>I also feel like twitter is much newer, not sure if they factored that into the study or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also feel like twitter is much newer, not sure if they factored that into the study or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBSEric</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/comment-page-1/#comment-70791</link>
		<dc:creator>IBSEric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/?p=992#comment-70791</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised in the least.  I am tiring of Twitter and the countless .bots that do nothing but spam. I&#039;ve since taken my personal Twitter and decided to only follow those people or enterprises I am personally interested in.
I&#039;ve done the same with my business account.  I simply cannot handle being a spam victim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised in the least.  I am tiring of Twitter and the countless .bots that do nothing but spam. I&#8217;ve since taken my personal Twitter and decided to only follow those people or enterprises I am personally interested in.<br />
I&#8217;ve done the same with my business account.  I simply cannot handle being a spam victim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/comment-page-1/#comment-70599</link>
		<dc:creator>jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/?p=992#comment-70599</guid>
		<description>I think facebooks return and loyalty stems from its &#039;closed gate&#039; style community. Cant be seen from the outside and once your in, its hard to leave!

Interesting read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think facebooks return and loyalty stems from its &#8216;closed gate&#8217; style community. Cant be seen from the outside and once your in, its hard to leave!</p>
<p>Interesting read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynasty Web</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/comment-page-1/#comment-70595</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynasty Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/?p=992#comment-70595</guid>
		<description>The reason that twitter is in last place is because most of the tweets are mostly garbage.  People on Facebook are not really trying to sell you on products like twitter users do. You know a lot more about the person on Facebook than Twitter.  

Twitter is a good social networking site, don&#039;t get me wrong, but it is so congested with useless tweets.  Especially if you have a mass amount of followers that aren&#039;t quality followers.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason that twitter is in last place is because most of the tweets are mostly garbage.  People on Facebook are not really trying to sell you on products like twitter users do. You know a lot more about the person on Facebook than Twitter.  </p>
<p>Twitter is a good social networking site, don&#8217;t get me wrong, but it is so congested with useless tweets.  Especially if you have a mass amount of followers that aren&#8217;t quality followers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO wizz</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/comment-page-1/#comment-70588</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO wizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/?p=992#comment-70588</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill,

I think your right in what you say about the set up. Twitter and Google are more about real time searching, facebook in my opinion is much more of a social experience, people click on the links with connection in mind, obviously they are not doing the same on Twitter.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,</p>
<p>I think your right in what you say about the set up. Twitter and Google are more about real time searching, facebook in my opinion is much more of a social experience, people click on the links with connection in mind, obviously they are not doing the same on Twitter.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/study-proves-facebook-and-digg-visitors-more-loyal-twitter-in-last-place/comment-page-1/#comment-70545</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/?p=992#comment-70545</guid>
		<description>Indeed facebook more widespread use and its function is almost equal to twitter.Thank  you for the information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed facebook more widespread use and its function is almost equal to twitter.Thank  you for the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
