<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: comScore Launches qSearch 2.0 in Japan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/comscore-launches-qsearch-20-in-japan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/comscore-launches-qsearch-20-in-japan/</link>
	<description>The search engine marketing and online promotion expert.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:32:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: In Anchor &#187; comScore qSearch 2.0 Launches inJapan</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/comscore-launches-qsearch-20-in-japan/comment-page-1/#comment-36458</link>
		<dc:creator>In Anchor &#187; comScore qSearch 2.0 Launches inJapan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 02:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/comscore-launches-qsearch-20-in-japan/#comment-36458</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slevi</title>
		<link>http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/comscore-launches-qsearch-20-in-japan/comment-page-1/#comment-20178</link>
		<dc:creator>Slevi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/comscore-launches-qsearch-20-in-japan/#comment-20178</guid>
		<description>&quot;Google has been picking up more of active searchers. Google users completed an average of 64.5 searches per searcher in July 2007, versus 56.0 searches per searcher for Yahoo!.&quot;
Rather than being more active searchers you could also interpret it as Google requiring more double searches because results would be less accurate. Just a way of looking at it, the figures don&#039;t really make clear as to why the average searches on Google is higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Google has been picking up more of active searchers. Google users completed an average of 64.5 searches per searcher in July 2007, versus 56.0 searches per searcher for Yahoo!.&#8221;<br />
Rather than being more active searchers you could also interpret it as Google requiring more double searches because results would be less accurate. Just a way of looking at it, the figures don&#8217;t really make clear as to why the average searches on Google is higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
